Two sentences that shut down any VC conversation


I recently got a couple of VCs interested in investing in Commune.

Whenever this happens, I always ask why they want to invest and what they are asking in exchange. It's always the same. They want a huge part of the cake. Usually, they want more than half at this stage. And they offer some good money. It's good for me, but it's actually not much for them. I'm talking about tickets from 200k to 500k USD.

However, what many people never tell you is that VCs strictly want hockey stick growth. They don't want to help you build a sustainable business. They want exponential growth. If you won't make it happen, they'll close your company. Actually, it becomes their company because you sold it in exchange for some investment.

That's fair, and it's a good trade if that's exactly what you want. However, it's incredibly risky at this stage to take that money because I only have the promise that it may work. I still have to validate Commune actually works.

I've been there. I've seen a great startup fail because their investors forced the founders to change their strategy in the middle of the course. That change damaged the company completely. What could have been a really sustainable business for those founders and perhaps one or two more employees ended up closing for good.

I don't want that for Commune. I want Commune to be sustainable, so I won't take VC money this early. Sure, I'm not new to this, and I know that at some point I may have to accept it as the only way to go. But I'll only do that once the business is fully validated. At that stage, you are playing a completely different game. You don't have to give up 50 percent of the company.

Taking VC money can make a great impact on your company, but it can also ruin it quickly.

In both of my conversations with VCs in the last month, I honestly told them I don't want Commune to become a huge corporation. I also told them I don't want to be a millionaire. I just want to have enough money to have a great life — and I'm cheap!

If you ever want to shut down a conversation with a VC, these two sentences are pure gold 😄

I'll keep bootstrapping Commune and we'll see where it takes us. Perhaps I fail to make it work, it just stays small and sustainable, or maybe it becomes so big that I have to accept I can't do this as a bootstrapped business anymore.

So this is my question for you this week: when do you think it actually makes sense to trade control of your company for a pile of venture capital? Hit the button below and let's chat on Commune.

Av. Joaquín Costa, 16, Badajoz, Badajoz 06001
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Fran Méndez

Hey hey! I'm Fran, the creator of the AsyncAPI specification (the industry standard for defining asynchronous APIs). Subscribe to my newsletter —The Weekly Shift— where I share expert advice about building Event-Driven Architecture and share my journey writing my first book, Shift: The Playbook for Event-Driven Architecture Advocacy.

Read more from Fran Méndez

In my last issue, I asked you a simple question: should I make Commune open source? I got a lot of responses on Commune (yay!) and over on LinkedIn. Honestly, the feedback blew my mind. I expected everyone to shout a resounding yes. That absolutely was not the case. I was surprised most of you recommended I avoid it. Incredible. That included a lot of people in my network who have spent years maintaining open source projects or building open source products. I definitely did not expect that....

Usually, I use this newsletter to share what I’m reading or thinking. Today, I’m flipping the script. I need your brain on one specific thing I’m wrestling with. Should we make Commune fully open-source? I’ve been building Commune as a headless, creator-first alternative to Substack. The goal is total independence. But lately, I’ve been asking myself if we need to take that a step further. You know my track record here. I built the AsyncAPI Initiative on the premise that specifications should...

I was watching La Revuelta the other night, catching the interview with Leiva. In this Spanish late-night show, he talked about something that sounds like a total nightmare for a musician: he’s lost his voice. He literally has to undergo surgery before every tour just to be able to sing or even speak again. I can’t even imagine the stress of that. But then he dropped a comment that really stopped me in my tracks. He said that during the periods when he couldn’t speak —when he was reduced to a...